Home Birth vs. Hospital Birth: Balancing Preference with Risk Assessment

by Kaitlyn Arbour 

The medicalization of childbirth has generated a dichotomy between “natural” and “medical” births.[1] Great strides in medicine over the past several decades have resulted in the ability to address complications that may arise during delivery, and as such have promoted childbirth in a hospital setting. However, the baggage of the technological imperative and the alienating atmosphere of a hospital demonstrate the flip side to the capabilities of modern medicine. The Mayo Clinic cited several reasons a woman may choose home births, including: “a desire to give birth in a familiar, relaxing environment surrounded by people of your choice; a desire to wear your own clothes, take a shower or bath, eat, drink and move around freely during labor; a desire to control your labor position or other aspects of the birthing process; and cultural or religious norms or concerns.”[2]

Sociologically, concepts surrounding natural childbirth have adopted a positive connotation. [3] Conversely, images surrounding childbirth in a hospital tend to be ridden with perceptions of drug-induced births and instrumental facilitations, with “10% of vaginal births involving the use of forceps or vacuum.”[4] The extent of control a woman experiences in the birthing process can be considerably diminished in a hospital setting. This perceived loss of control also contributes to the increasing desirability of home births by more mothers.[5] In the past several decades, most births in the United States have occurred within hospitals. However, there is a growing trend toward moving childbirth back to the home where a more natural childbirthing process can occur. The CDC reported a 29% increase in home births from 2004 to 2009 (although the rate is still extremely low with 0.72% of all births being home births in 2009).[6] As this trend continues to grow, several factors must be taken into consideration.

The first, and perhaps most important, factor that must be considered in the decision to give birth in either the home or the hospital is the risk involved in both settings. Many advocates of home births have often cited the fact that it is not risky to give birth in the home.[7] However, this becomes a matter of relativity according to new reports from the New England Journal of Medicine, which stated that “the risk of perinatal death was twice as high in planned out of hospital births as in in-hospital births (3.9 vs. 1.8 deaths per 1000 deliveries; P=0.003).”[8] In addition, at-home births are generally more common with multiparous women over the age of 35, and tend to be classified as low-risk pregnancies.[9] Although the risk of perinatal death is two times greater for birth at home compared to birth at the hospital, it should be noted that the absolute level of risk for both settings is still very low.

While relative riskiness and unpredictability favor hospital births, there are several reported disadvantages to giving birth in a hospital setting. Other factors that must be taken into account when determining home or hospital birth include rates of cesarean sections and maternal experiences in both settings. Cesarean sections are almost five times as likely to occur in a planned hospital birth compared to a planned home birth.[10] A mother’s persistence of spontaneous vaginal delivery in congruence with an awareness of the dangers that accompany cesarean sections may influence a woman’s decision to give birth in the home rather than in the hospital. In addition, clinician-researcher Judith Lothian outlined in The Journal of Perinatal Education that one in four women described feeling “overwhelmed and frightened during labor, and unsure and isolated in the postpartum period.”[11] Although these unpleasant emotions are not felt by a significant majority of women, they are of considerable importance in understanding a mother’s personal preference regarding place of childbirth.

Although the reported risks of home births have been consistent with previous findings, the debate over home versus hospital birthplace preference persists. The matter is further complicated considering that professional midwifery and other methods of ensuring a safe at-home delivery are not well integrated in the United States’ health care system.[12] Compared to countries such as the Netherlands and United Kingdom, where at-home births account for 20% and 8% of births respectively, the United States’ health care system is significantly lacking in its ability to secure the safety of at-home births by providing certified caregivers and easy access to hospitals, should transfer be required due to unforeseen complications.[13]

In the end, the preference for home versus hospital births in low-risk pregnancies should be the personal choice of a properly informed mother. For those mothers who decide that the risk is worth taking, advancements within our current health care system are needed to ensure the safety of both mothers and newborns.

 

References:

[1] In this article, “natural” births will be used interchangeably with “home” births and “medical” births will be used interchangeably with “hospital” births. While natural births can connate several types of birthing methods, in this article it will be used only to define birth within a home setting. “Medical” births will only be used to define birth within a hospital setting.

[2] Mayo Clinic. “Home Birth: Know the pros and cons.” http://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/labor-and-delivery/in-depth/home-birth/art-20046878.

[3] Brubaker, Sarah J. and Heather E. Dillaway. “Medicalization, Natural Childbirth and Birthing Experiences.” Sociology Compass 3, no. 1 (2009): 34.

[4] Lothian, Judith A. “Listening to Mothers—The First National U.S. Survey of Women’s Childbearing Experiences.” The Journal of Perinatal Education 12, no. 1 (2003): 7.

[5] Ibid, 36.

[6] MacDorman, Marian F., T.J. Mathews, and Eugene Declercq. “Home Births in the United States, 1990–2009.” U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

[7] Rob Stein, “Giving Birth Outside A Hospital Is A Little Riskier For The Baby.” NPR, December 30, 2015.

[8] Wilbur, MaryAnn B., Sarah Little, and Linda M. Szymanski. “Is Home Birth Safe?” The New England Journal of Medicine 373, no. 27 (December 31, 2015): 2684.

[9] MacDorman, “Home Births in the United States, 1990–2009.”

[10] Ibid, 2683.

[11] Lothian, Judith A. “Listening to Mothers- The First National U.S. Survey of Women’s Childbearing Experiences.” The Journal of Perinatal Education 12, no. 1 (2003): 8.

[12] Stein, “Giving Birth Outside a Hospital.”

[13] Wilbur, “Is Home Birth Safe?” at 2684.

 

One comment

  1. I’ve been a perinatal nurse and IBCLC for 17 years. Most of my work has involved reversing breastfeeding failures due to bf unfriendly hospital practices. I recently attended the home birth of my niece’s baby. Wow! Like a breath of fresh air. It just went like clockwork: 5 hours, 3 pushes and a beautiful baby who went to breast in one go…what a difference it makes when you stop interfering. So much morbidity occurs due to the poor practices of perinatal staff. They just do not listen or read the research. No wonder everything goes wrong at the hospital and why so much bf failure! The article should say: “if you’re willing to take the risk of delivering at a hospital….” The stats speak for themselves. Midwives have better practices and therefore better stats. This is why so many doctors and nurses and choosing home births. They know what goes on at the hospital. It may be good enough for their patients but the the truth is that it isn’t good enough for them. What does that tell you? My niece’s baby regained her birthweight in 6 days and then went off the charts. I always knew that a baby that was properly breastfed from the beginning would gain more that the 100 percentile. Most bf babies get by. It ‘s better than formula but when you do it right, there’s a big difference. Especially in the amount of crying. My niece’s baby rarely cries…at all. Most bf babies cry because they’re hungry and not getting enough. And formula fed babies cry because of indigestion. A well fed infant doesn’t cry like that. So when it came for the visit to the GP, my niece told him that she had decided not to vaccinate. The GP said that his wife was pregnant and they had decided the same. Times are changing!!! Ruthie Sue, RN & IBCLC

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s